HR and talent leaders
Screen everyone, interview the best.
Screen high-volume hiring fairly and fast, with the decision left to your people.
The service at a glance
Hundreds of applicants, a small HR team, and good candidates lost in the pile.
Screening by hand is slow and inconsistent, and interview quality depends on who happened to be in the room.
We automate first-round screening: structured video interviews scored on the same criteria for everyone, so your team meets only the candidates worth meeting.
Who it is for
Screen everyone, interview the best.
Shortlists with evidence, not gut feel.
Lower cost and time per hire.
Documented, fair decisions.
The goal: an AI-ready organisation
Connected, clean, governed and allowed for AI use.
Agreed measures, one definition each, a named owner.
Roles, decision rights and skills to adopt AI safely.
Approach
Agree what good looks like per role.
Set up structured video interviews.
Tune scoring with your hiring team.
Audit fairness and outcomes regularly.
Engagement options
Screen one high-volume role.
Screening across all hiring.
Screening plus assessments and analytics.
Scope
Bilytica frameworks behind this service
One control set that answers NIST, ISO 42001, the EU AI Act and the Saudi regulators at once.
See the frameworkVALUEFrom use-case long list to booked benefit, with unit economics attached at every step.
See the frameworkStructured asynchronous video and voice interviews with automatic transcription, competency scoring against a published rubric, and shortlisting that a recruiter reviews. Built for volume hiring, retail, contact centres, field crews, graduate intakes, where a shortlist takes weeks today.
Scored against a rubric, not a vibe
Competencies are defined and published up front; the model scores evidence against them and shows the passage it scored.
No inference from face or accent
We do not score appearance, emotion or personality from video. Those systems are being restricted in several jurisdictions and they do not survive an audit.
Bias tested before launch
Adverse-impact analysis across the groups your policy protects, repeated on every rubric change.
The offer is always a human decision
The system ranks and explains; a hiring manager decides and the reason is recorded.
We inspect the systems, the data behind them and the quality of the records this capability will depend on, then write down what has to be fixed before anything is built.
One workflow, one team, real traffic, measured against the baseline we captured before we started.
Guardrails, approval gates, evaluation sets, logging and the evidence pack your auditor and your regulator will ask for.
Additional workflows, sites or languages, then runbooks and training so your team can operate it without us.
Great AI cannot hide bad data. These are the conditions this capability depends on, we fix them as part of delivery, not after go-live.