Frameworks for Saudi Arabia

Methods judged by the business result they leave behind

Each framework starts from a business problem, names the teams involved, and ends with something you keep: clean data, agreed KPIs, an owner for every AI use case.

In Saudi Arabia

Which Saudi requirement each framework answers

In Saudi Arabia a method is judged by what it hands a reviewer. Before the stage names, here is the obligation each family of frameworks is written against and the artefact it produces.

SDAIA, PDPL

AI systems handling personal data need a lawful basis, a stated purpose and a disclosure the data subject can act on.

The assurance and governance stages fix purpose, lawful basis and subject-rights handling as an exit gate, not a closing document.

Processing register entry and a subject-rights runbook per released workload.

NDMO data management controls

Data domains carry named owners, classification, quality thresholds and measurable maturity across the control domains.

The data foundation and quality frameworks certify a domain before any workload is allowed to build on it.

Domain certificate with owner, lineage, classification and a maturity baseline you can re-run.

NCA ECC

Security controls are evidenced continuously, and autonomous actions need an authorisation path that can be shown.

Agent operations sets action classes, hard stops and containment tests before an agent is allowed to write anywhere.

Action-authority matrix and a replayable log per autonomous action.

Sector authority, SAMA, NPHIES and MOH, ZATCA

The sector regulator adds its own review: model risk in finance, clinical safety in health, invoicing integrity in retail and logistics.

Each framework carries a sector overlay that changes the gates and the controls, while the structure stays the same.

Sector review pack aligned to the authority that will actually read it.

Where it runs

Assessments, control registers and evidence generated by these frameworks stay inside your environment in Saudi Arabia and remain yours after the engagement closes.

Arabic, as it is spoken here

Policies, gates and control descriptions are issued in Arabic as the governing version, because that is the version an inspector in Saudi Arabia will read.

Where the value lands

What these methods change

A framework is only worth the change it produces. Ours are written to move the data layer, the decision layer and the measures at once, and each stage states which one it is moving.

At the data layer

Ownership, lineage, quality thresholds and residency become explicit, so a workload can be certified to stand on a defined domain rather than on assumption.

At the decision layer

Decisions move from opinion to evidence: a named owner, a gate that must be passed, and a record an auditor, a regulator or the board can inspect after the fact.

In the business measures

The change is reported in the measures leadership already tracks, cycle time, cost to serve, risk exposure, service levels and revenue captured, not in model metrics alone.

Framework selector

Choose your AI framework

Answer a few questions and we point you to the framework to start with, and what follows it.

1

Your industry

2

What you are trying to do

3

Where you are today

Pick all three to see your recommendation, 0 of 3 chosen.

The library

The framework library

The methods that carry an AI programme from a readiness score to a governed release a regulator can inspect, trusted data, evidenced decisions, measurable business outcomes.

DFFv2.1

Data Foundation Framework

The layers that turn scattered systems into data an AI system is allowed to use.

Decision cycle
  1. 1Capture
  2. 2Contract
  3. 3Consolidate
  4. 4Curate
  5. 5Certify

Each step closes on an exit gate, so the control is evidenced before the next decision is taken.

Data layer
Foundation
Decision layer
Every source has a named owner, a refresh frequency and a lawful basis for use.
Business measures
Domain data contracts
Accountable
Run by data engineering and data governance; signed off by the data owner of each domain.
First pass
A first certified domain on a timeline agreed with you; each additional domain runs shorter as the contracts and tests are reused.
Open the framework
AIRMv2.0

AI Readiness Model

One honest picture of what your organisation can actually run with AI today.

Decision cycle
  1. 1Scope
  2. 2Evidence
  3. 3Gap
  4. 4Sequence
  5. 5Re-score

Each step closes on an exit gate, so the control is evidenced before the next decision is taken.

Data layer
Diagnose
Decision layer
The scope names decisions, not departments.
Business measures
Scored maturity profile
Accountable
Run jointly by the CDO or CIO office and the business sponsor of the first workload.
First pass
Agreed with you, including interviews, evidence review and the roadmap workshop.
Open the framework
VALUEv1.4

AI Value Framework

From use-case long list to booked benefit, with unit economics attached at every step.

Decision cycle
  1. 1Discover
  2. 2Size
  3. 3Sequence
  4. 4Commit
  5. 5Realise

Each step closes on an exit gate, so the control is evidenced before the next decision is taken.

Data layer
Decide
Decision layer
Each candidate names a decision and the person who makes it today.
Business measures
Sized use-case portfolio
Accountable
Owned by the business sponsor with finance as co-signer on the benefit definition.
First pass
Agreed with you for a portfolio pass; benefit tracking then runs quarterly.
Open the framework
TRUSTv2.2

AI Assurance Framework

One control set that answers NIST, ISO 42001, the EU AI Act and the Saudi regulators at once.

Decision cycle
  1. 1Classify
  2. 2Control
  3. 3Evidence
  4. 4Attest
  5. 5Monitor

Each step closes on an exit gate, so the control is evidenced before the next decision is taken.

Data layer
Assure
Decision layer
The tier is recorded before any model touches production data.
Business measures
Tiered control matrix
Accountable
Owned by risk and compliance, operated with the delivery team that builds each workload.
First pass
Control set stood up on a timeline agreed with you; evidence then accrues automatically per release.
Open the framework
DELIVERv2.0

AI Delivery Framework

A gated path from idea to live service, with evidence at every step.

Decision cycle
  1. 1Frame
  2. 2Ground
  3. 3Prototype
  4. 4Evaluate
  5. 5Harden
  6. 6Launch
  7. 7Operate

Each step closes on an exit gate, so the control is evidenced before the next decision is taken.

Data layer
Build
Decision layer
A written definition of a wrong answer exists.
Business measures
Golden dataset and evals
Accountable
Run by the delivery lead; each gate is signed by the business owner and by risk where the tier requires it.
First pass
A first governed release once the data domain is certified, timeline agreed after the assessment.
Open the framework
AGENTv1.6

Agent Operations Framework

Autonomy tiers, tool boundaries and human checkpoints, so agents can act without becoming a liability.

Decision cycle
  1. 1Tier
  2. 2Bound
  3. 3Checkpoint
  4. 4Evaluate
  5. 5Observe
  6. 6Contain

Each step closes on an exit gate, so the control is evidenced before the next decision is taken.

Data layer
Act
Decision layer
Irreversible actions never sit above the reviewed tier.
Business measures
Autonomy tier policy
Accountable
Owned jointly by the process owner and security; operated by the platform team.
First pass
Tiering and boundaries defined on a timeline agreed with you; then applied per agent at delivery time.
Open the framework
SOVEREIGNv1.5

Sovereign AI Framework

Residency, key custody, model routing and Arabic quality treated as architecture, not policy text.

Decision cycle
  1. 1Classify residency
  2. 2Place the stack
  3. 3Custody keys
  4. 4Route models
  5. 5Assure Arabic
  6. 6Plan the exit

Each step closes on an exit gate, so the control is evidenced before the next decision is taken.

Data layer
Sovereignty
Decision layer
No workload starts before its data classes have a residency rule.
Business measures
Residency matrix
Accountable
Owned by the CISO and the data protection officer, with architecture accountable for the design.
First pass
Reference design on a timeline agreed with you, then applied to every workload as a standing constraint.
Open the framework
Why this exists

Standards say what good looks like. These say what to do on Monday.

1

Every stage ends with an artefact, so progress is evidenced instead of reported.

2

Every framework crosswalks to the standards a regulator or auditor already uses.

3

Every framework carries industry overlays, and Arabic quality is a release condition, not a translation task.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Which framework fits my problem?

Start from the problem: scattered data points to the Data Foundation Framework, unclear KPIs to the KPI framework, and AI ideas without owners to the AI value framework. Each page explains the problem, who takes part, and what you keep. Where a regulation such as PDPL applies, the page shows how the work helps you meet it.

Do these replace NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001?

No. Saudi controls sit on top of the recognised standards, and reviewers check both. Every control row carries its international counterpart, so a single control set answers the local authority and the auditor without duplicating work.

Where do the workloads and the evidence live?

Inside Saudi Arabia, in your environment. Assessments, registers and gate evidence stay yours after the engagement ends, and any component that sits outside that boundary is written down as an exception with a data class, a reason and an expiry date.

Where should a Saudi enterprise start?

With a readiness baseline against the NDMO control set, then the data foundation framework applied to the one domain the first workload depends on. A certified domain is what lets a release pass its gate instead of stalling in review.

Cookie & Privacy Notice

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyse site traffic, in line with our Privacy Policy and the Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL). You can keep essential cookies only.