Retail operations
Gaps fixed before customers notice.
See out-of-stocks, share of shelf and planogram drift the day they happen.
The service at a glance
Shelves are checked by eye, so gaps and wrong placements are found late.
Out-of-stocks and planogram drift cost sales every day, and manual audits cover a fraction of stores.
We use cameras and image recognition to read shelves continuously: what is missing, what is misplaced, and whether displays match the agreed plan.
Who it is for
Gaps fixed before customers notice.
Proof that plans are executed.
Shared, factual display data.
Recovered sales from availability.
The goal: an AI-ready organisation
Connected, clean, governed and allowed for AI use.
Agreed measures, one definition each, a named owner.
Roles, decision rights and skills to adopt AI safely.
Approach
Digitise planograms and priorities.
Train recognition on your products.
Route gaps to the right team.
Score compliance per store and supplier.
Engagement options
One category in a few stores.
Shelf intelligence across stores.
Shared compliance reporting.
Scope
Bilytica frameworks behind this service
The layers that turn scattered systems into data an AI system is allowed to use.
See the frameworkVALUEFrom use-case long list to booked benefit, with unit economics attached at every step.
See the frameworkImage recognition over fixed cameras, shelf-scanning robots or staff phone photos that identifies products on the shelf, flags gaps, checks facings against the planogram and measures share of shelf against competitors. Alerts land in the store team's task app instead of a monthly audit report.
Out-of-stock is a revenue leak, not a reporting problem
Detection is only useful if it becomes a task with an owner and a deadline in the store.
Planogram compliance without the clipboard
Facings, sequence and price-label mismatches checked continuously rather than on an auditor's visit.
Supplier-grade evidence
Share of shelf and compliance images give category and trade-marketing teams something to negotiate with.
Phone photos are a valid starting point
A camera programme can wait; a good model on staff-captured images proves the value first.
We inspect the systems, the data behind them and the quality of the records this capability will depend on, then write down what has to be fixed before anything is built.
One workflow, one team, real traffic, measured against the baseline we captured before we started.
Guardrails, approval gates, evaluation sets, logging and the evidence pack your auditor and your regulator will ask for.
Additional workflows, sites or languages, then runbooks and training so your team can operate it without us.
Great AI cannot hide bad data. These are the conditions this capability depends on, we fix them as part of delivery, not after go-live.