CEO and executive team
Answers in the meeting, not after.
Ask a question in Arabic or English and get the number, with the query behind it.
The service at a glance
Every data question waits in a queue for the BI team.
Leaders ask questions in meetings; answers arrive days later as a new dashboard request.
We put a governed conversational layer on your data: people ask in Arabic or English, and the platform answers from certified datasets with the logic shown.
Who it is for
Answers in the meeting, not after.
Self-service without tickets.
Time for depth, not queue-clearing.
Only governed data is exposed.
The goal: an AI-ready organisation
Connected, clean, governed and allowed for AI use.
Agreed measures, one definition each, a named owner.
Roles, decision rights and skills to adopt AI safely.
Approach
Define the trusted datasets first.
Build the semantic layer and KPIs.
Let people ask, with guardrails.
Learn from the questions asked.
Engagement options
Conversational analytics for one team.
Certified self-service per function.
One governed layer for everyone.
Scope
Bilytica frameworks behind this service
The layers that turn scattered systems into data an AI system is allowed to use.
See the frameworkVALUEFrom use-case long list to booked benefit, with unit economics attached at every step.
See the frameworkA natural-language layer over a governed semantic model: the question is translated into a query against certified metrics, the answer shows the SQL and the source, and permissions follow the user. The governance work is the product, without a semantic layer, natural-language analytics produces confident, inconsistent numbers.
One definition per metric
'Active customer' has to mean one thing before a model can answer questions about it.
Show the query, always
Analysts trust what they can inspect; hidden SQL is how a wrong number reaches a board pack.
Permissions follow the person
Row and column security is enforced in the warehouse, not in the prompt.
Arabic questions, Arabic answers
Business terms are mapped bilingually so the same question works in either language.
We inspect the systems, the data behind them and the quality of the records this capability will depend on, then write down what has to be fixed before anything is built.
One workflow, one team, real traffic, measured against the baseline we captured before we started.
Guardrails, approval gates, evaluation sets, logging and the evidence pack your auditor and your regulator will ask for.
Additional workflows, sites or languages, then runbooks and training so your team can operate it without us.
Great AI cannot hide bad data. These are the conditions this capability depends on, we fix them as part of delivery, not after go-live.