Compliance & data trust

Built to survive the Saudi review, not just the demo

The spine of this page is the Saudi control set: PDPL and its implementing regulations, NDMO data management standards, NCA Essential Cybersecurity Controls, and data residency assigned by classification. Below it are the sector-specific bodies, SDAIA, SAMA and DGA, and what we do about each so your team can answer a reviewer without assembling the evidence by hand.

What you are assessed against

Six bodies of expectation shape most Saudi data and AI reviews. Each entry below is what it covers, and what we do about it in delivery.

NCA

National Cybersecurity Authority cloud controls

Cloud cybersecurity controls covering classification-driven hosting decisions, tenant separation, key management, logging and supplier assurance.

What we do: We place each workload according to data classification and write down the reasoning, so a reviewer can follow why a component runs where it runs.

DGA

Digital Government Authority requirements

Interoperability, digital service quality and data-sharing expectations for government entities and their delivery partners.

What we do: Integrations are built as governed, documented interfaces with defined ownership rather than point-to-point extracts nobody maintains.

Free download · PDF

Sovereign AI reference architecture

Nine pages: the five-layer architecture, a residency decision model per component, the PDPL / NDMO / SDAIA / NCA control mapping, and the audit-evidence checklist as a printable list.

English · 17 mapped controls · 12 evidence artefacts · 0.1 MB

Download the PDF

No form, no email required. The document describes architecture and delivery practice, it is not a certification, accreditation, audit opinion or regulator endorsement, and control identifiers are our reading of published national expectations.

Control mapping, line by line

Every control below names the requirement, where it is enforced in the architecture, and the artefact it produces. Filter by regulator to see the subset a specific reviewer cares about.

PDPL-01Governed data layer

Personal data is processed for a defined, recorded purpose and no more data is used than that purpose needs.

In the architecture
Every dataset entering the platform is registered with a purpose, an owner and a classification. Pipelines carry column-level allow-lists, so a downstream product cannot silently widen the fields it consumes.
Evidence produced
Dataset register export: purpose, owner, classification, fields in use, consuming products.
PDPL-02Governed data layer

Data subjects can exercise access, correction and deletion rights within the statutory window.

In the architecture
A subject identifier is resolved once in the master-data layer, then lineage lists every table, extract, index and embedding store holding that person. Deletion runs as one governed job across all of them, including the AI retrieval index.
Evidence produced
Worked DSAR run: request, resolved identity, systems touched, records returned or removed, timestamps.
PDPL-03Residency & platform

Cross-border transfer of personal data is controlled and justified.

In the architecture
Classification decides placement. Personal and restricted data is processed on in-country infrastructure, including embeddings and inference; anything that would leave Saudi Arabia requires a written exception with a named approver, and the platform blocks egress by default.
Evidence produced
Residency decision record per component, plus the egress policy and the exception log.
PDPL-04Assurance & operations

Retention periods are defined and enforced, and breaches are detectable and reportable.

In the architecture
Retention is a property of the dataset, not a manual habit: expiry jobs run on schedule and write what they removed. Access to personal data is logged at query level and monitored for unusual volume or off-pattern access.
Evidence produced
Retention schedule, deletion job history, access log sample and the alerting rules in force.
NDMO-01Governed data layer

Data governance is operating: ownership, stewardship and decision rights are assigned and exercised.

In the architecture
Each domain has a named owner and steward inside the catalogue, and changes to definitions or classifications route through them. Governance is enforced by the platform rather than described in a document.
Evidence produced
Catalogue export showing owners, stewards and the change history behind each definition.
NDMO-02Governed data layer

Metadata and lineage are maintained so any published figure can be traced to source.

In the architecture
Lineage is captured automatically from the transformation layer, not drawn by hand, and every metric on a dashboard or in an AI answer links back to the model and source columns behind it.
Evidence produced
Lineage graph export for a named metric, from dashboard tile back to source table.
NDMO-03Governed data layer

Data quality is measured against defined rules, and issues have owners and remediation paths.

In the architecture
Quality rules run as tests in the pipeline. A failing rule can hold a release rather than surface later as a wrong number, and open issues sit in a queue with an owner and an age.
Evidence produced
Quality rule inventory, pass/fail history and the open-issue queue with ageing.
NDMO-04Governed data layer

Data is classified, and handling rules follow the classification wherever the data goes.

In the architecture
Classification is applied at the column level and inherited by every derived table, extract, index and embedding. A restricted column cannot lose its classification by being copied into a new model.
Evidence produced
Classification register with inheritance view: source column to every downstream object.
NDMO-05Governed data layer

Master and reference data are managed so entities are not duplicated across systems.

In the architecture
Customer, supplier, employee and asset entities are resolved into golden records with survivorship rules that are readable, versioned and reversible.
Evidence produced
Match and survivorship rule set, duplicate-rate trend, and a sample resolved record with its inputs.
SDAIA-01Model layer

Each AI use case has a documented purpose, scope and prohibited uses.

In the architecture
Nothing reaches production without a register entry: what it is for, the data it may see, the decisions it may influence, and an explicit list of what it must not do.
Evidence produced
Model and agent register entry, signed off by the business owner.
SDAIA-02Model layer

Outputs are evaluated for accuracy and fairness before and after deployment.

In the architecture
Every use case has a held-out evaluation set built with the business, including Arabic-language cases where the workflow is Arabic. Scores are re-run on every change, and regression below threshold blocks release.
Evidence produced
Evaluation set, scores by release, and the threshold policy that gates deployment.
SDAIA-03Agent & application layer

Human oversight exists where AI affects a person or a material decision.

In the architecture
Agents act inside permissions and approval thresholds. Anything above a threshold, or anything touching a customer outcome, stops for a named human with the full context attached.
Evidence produced
Approval matrix, escalation paths and an action log showing what was auto-approved versus reviewed.
SDAIA-04Agent & application layer

AI answers are explainable and attributable, not unsourced assertions.

In the architecture
Retrieval answers carry citations to the underlying document or governed metric, and the interface shows when the system has insufficient grounding instead of producing a confident guess.
Evidence produced
Sample transcripts with citations, plus the abstention rate and how it is monitored.
NCA-01Residency & platform

Hosting decisions follow data classification, with tenant separation for sensitive workloads.

In the architecture
The stack deploys as a private tenant, in your cloud subscription, an in-country region, or on-premises, with no shared inference endpoint for restricted data and no vendor-side copy of your corpus.
Evidence produced
Deployment topology diagram, tenancy model and the placement decision per component.
NCA-02Residency & platform

Identity, access and privilege are centrally controlled and least-privilege by default.

In the architecture
The platform federates to your identity provider. Roles map to data classifications, and the same entitlements are enforced in dashboards, APIs and AI retrieval, an agent cannot read what its caller cannot read.
Evidence produced
Role-to-classification matrix, federation configuration and a permission-filtered retrieval test.
NCA-03Residency & platform

Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, with controlled key management.

In the architecture
Transport encryption everywhere, encryption at rest on storage and vector indexes, and customer-managed keys where your policy requires the organisation to hold them.
Evidence produced
Encryption and key-management statement per store, including the vector index.
NCA-04Assurance & operations

Activity is logged, retained and monitored, and third-party components are assured.

In the architecture
Prompts, retrievals, agent actions and data access write to an immutable log shipped to your SIEM. Every third-party component in the stack is listed with its version, licence and where it runs.
Evidence produced
Log schema and retention, SIEM integration note, and the component bill of materials.

Reference identifiers are Bilytica's own. This mapping is our reading of published national expectations and a description of delivery practice, not a certification, audit outcome or regulator endorsement.

These controls are enforced through the TRUST AI Assurance Framework and the SOVEREIGN in-country framework, part of the Bilytica AI Frameworks.

The evidence we hand over

Compliance work is only cheap the second time if the artefacts come from the platform. Tick what you already hold to see the size of the gap.

0 of 12 artefacts you already have

Questions procurement teams ask

Does Bilytica hold formal certifications?

We work to the national standards described on this page and design engagements so your organisation can evidence them. Where a specific certification or attestation is required in a tender, tell us which one and we will respond directly with our current position rather than a general claim.

Can all data stay inside Saudi Arabia?

Yes, where the classification requires it. Ingestion, storage, modelling, embeddings, retrieval indexes and model inference can each be placed in-country, including against privately hosted or sovereign model endpoints.

How do you handle personal data during a project?

By minimising it. We prefer masked, synthetic or subset data for development, and where production personal data is unavoidable it is accessed under your controls, inside your environment, with the access recorded.

What do you provide for a procurement or vendor review?

A written architecture and residency position for the proposed solution, the evidence artefacts listed above, and named responses to the control questions in your review pack, in Arabic and English.

Find out where you actually stand

A scoped readiness assessment gives you a score per domain, the evidence behind it, and a sequenced plan to close the gaps, before an external assessment produces the number for you.

Cookie & Privacy Notice

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyse site traffic, in line with our Privacy Policy and the Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL). You can keep essential cookies only.